Page:
archival_software
No results
2
archival_software
ibu edited this page 2024-08-11 08:34:11 +00:00
Table of Contents
Archival software
There are many options for choosing archival software. A link on that page contains a spreadsheet with a comparison of archival management software. Abbreviations: CMS=ContentManagmentSystem, DAMS=DigitalAssetManagementSystem
There is also a German list of archival software solutions.
Our requirements:
- A hard requirement for the chosen solution is the possibility to export the data in a standardized encoding (EAD and either DACS or ISAD(G)).
- The solution should also support OAI-PMH for publishing metadata feeds, so that our data can be hoste locally and shared vie federation. Cf. the list of open archives.
Relevant OSS (=OpenSourceSoftware) solutions with annotations:
- ☉: Archivist's toolkit user manual
- (too) old ("the first open source archival data management system to provide broad, integrated support for the management of archives")
- written in java
- ☉: collectiveaccess demo manual: data modelling
- since 2003; developed by company Whirl-i-Gig (few employees), financed through product support it seems
- requires PHP+MySQL, still php7; v2.0 in preparation
- supports many standards (table), in particular DACS+EAD and ISAD(G)+EAD
- highly configurable
- cataloging app is separated from finding app
- seems to not provides these functionalities we do not need: Appraisal; Accessioning; Custodial Management/Inventory Control; Preservation Administration
- ☉: ArchivesSpace
- seems to require membership (if not now, it may do so later) with membership fee costs
- ☉: AtoM wikipedia demo docs
- since 2007
- requires PHP+MySQL, still php7 (PostgreSQL "potentially compatible"); roadmap; requires Elasticsearch as separate service
- supports standards ISAD(G)+EAD, EAC-CPF and SKOS (and ISAD, ISAAR, ISDIAH, ISDF) and Dublin Core, MODS
- ☉: Archivematica
- supports publication metadata standards, but not archival metadata standards
- useful for managing digital contents and its metadata
- not exactly for archival descriptions, but can extend archival catalogs: integration with AtoM and ArchivesSpace
- development seemingly financed by paid new features
- ☉: arTUX
- archium website is German only - seems to be a small company; risk of commercialization and relatively small user base
- ☉: Omeka comes in 2 variants: Omeka S and Omeka Classic: "Omeka Classic is perfect for smaller projects. Omeka.net is the place to go if you don't want to host your own. And, Omeka S is all linked open data and made for larger ventures"
- written in PHP
- useful for online exibitions
- supports LOD
- originally launched at the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media with funding from multiple organizations, team size: 5 people
- open issues (omega classic) don't look like it's a vera matue project
Conclusion: We should use collectiveaccess or AtoM; not sure yet which one, will have to try them out more.